Wow! Through family research, I found that this
was just not the case. The old saying
that the first baby doesn’t necessarily take nine months, is true. While I am not going to make a list of these
children, or their mothers, you too might have already located this type of information.
However, the
example that shocked me, and may never be explained is in the story of Julie
Ernestine Louise Ambellan, my husband’s gr-grandmother. In her US records, Ernestine
always listed herself as a widow with the married name of Ambellan. Her immigration records, census records and
her death record list her as a widow. Even the 1913 Buffalo City Directory has her listed as the widow of Frederick Ambellan. For 20 years, I did not know her
maiden name. The family story was that
their father was in the military and away at war, and not really around the
family, so they did not know him well.
I first
noticed that when five of her children who were born in Hardenbeck,
Brandenburg, Germany between 1870-1886 registered to marry in Buffalo, New York,
they listed various names for their parents. (Marie married in New York City,
so I do not have her information.)
Emilie listed Frederick and Ernestine Ambellan (no maiden
name)
Bertha listed Frederick Ambellan and Ernestina KeppelHerman listed Herman Ambellan and Ernestine Koppen
Anna listed unknown father and Ernestine Ambellan
Helen listed unknown father and Ernestine Ambellan
How could these children not know the name of their father
and mother correctly? Even if he was
away in the military, I was surprised that they did not know even his name.
When the Hardenbeck records became available there was
clarification and a surprise.
Ernestine’s children’s baptism records of show that she
never married the father of her children.
Ambellan is her maiden name!
Each record for five of her six children, (unable to find Marie's)
states that Ernestine's father, Johann Friedrich Ambellan came to the church to
deliver the news that his unmarried daughter, Ernestine, had delivered a(nother)
child. This must have been very
difficult for her father.
In the late 1800's, being an unwed mother was not uncommon.
In this case, there are several possibilities.
It may have been the same father. Many times, couples did not marry
until the father completed his military commitment and the couple had enough
money to pay a tax that was needed to marry.
OR, perhaps there were different fathers. (Sadly, there could be 6
different men.)
However, the surname Koeppen frequently appears in
Hardenbeck records during that time period.
(Koeppel not at all). A man with surname Koeppen probably did
father one or more of the children. I do
not have pictures of all of Ernestine’s children, so have not been able to see
if there are resemblances. DNA? Nothing yet.
This mystery may never be solved.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment